A professor of law at Colombia University has been forced to resign for his support for pro-Palestine activism and protesting Israeli students’ attacks against pro-Palestinian campaigners.

Katherine Franke stepped down from teaching at the facility and faces the threat of her action being defined as “retirement” by the university’s authorities, various American media outlets reported on Saturday.

She penned an extensive message, explaining her decision and the circumstances surrounding it.

“The university administrators have created such a toxic and hostile environment for legitimate debate around the [Israeli regime’s genocidal] war [against the Gaza Strip]…and Palestine that I can no longer teach or conduct research,” she wrote.

The former professor regretted that the October 2023-present brutal military assault had resulted in “horrendous devastation in Gaza,” besides claiming the lives of more than 46,500 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

She noted that the warfare had led to widespread protests across the world’s academic communities.

Amid the protests, “I have ardently defended students’ right to peaceful protest on our campus and across the country,” Franke underlined.

Her support for the campaigners, she said, was rooted in her “true belief that student engagement with the rights and dignity of Palestinians continued a celebrated tradition of student protest at Columbia University.”
However, “the university has allowed its own disciplinary process to be weaponized against members of our community, including myself,” Franke lamented.

She also pointed to Israeli students’ provocative acts of attacking the pro-Palestinian students with toxic chemical substances that had “caused such significant injuries that several students were hospitalized.”

According to Franke, the attackers used to be enlisted with the Israeli military amid the latter’s ongoing genocidal adventures, war crimes, and crimes against humanity across the West Asia region.

She also underscored that “while the university may call this change in my status ‘retirement,’ it should be more accurately understood as a termination dressed up in more palatable terms.”

“To describe my change in status with the university as a ‘retirement’ is both misleading and disingenuous,” she reiterated.