While throng of congratulatory messages pour from authorities of different countries for the new Iranian president elect and all countries express their positive view over the election stressing expansion of cooperation with Islamic Republic of Iran, officials of the Zionist regime follow the topic quite concernedly.

They fear that resumption of constructive ties between Iran and world countries neutralizes their achievements from many years of anti-Iran efforts and hostile views on Iran’s peaceful nuclear activities, dragging them back to the scratch.

From this view point results of Iran presidential election, besides other domestic and international achievements, have been a great punch to policies and objectives of the Zionist regime, particularly Likud Party.

Apparently Zionist regime’s approach, regarding recent political changes in Iran, has a long background. It dates back to a time when “Dialogue among Civilization” was on top of Iran’s foreign policy agenda, providing the grounds for interaction and constructive cooperation between world of Christianity and Islam and also Iran and western countries. Zionist lobbies, as they confessed later, faced a great challenge to provoke world countries against Iran.

To analyze the reasons why Zionist circles are so much concerned over cooperation of world countries with the Islamic Republic of Iran or closeness of the worlds of Islam and Christianity, it has to be mentioned that fueling differences between Muslims and Christians have been on the agenda of Jews since the beginning of Islam showing its proofs in historical clashes between Muslims and Christians. The role has been organized in a more explicit form after imposition of Zionist existence on Palestine that was followed by formation of disagreements between different Islamic denominations, particularly Shia and Sunni.

Therefore, Zionist regime is concerned that warm welcome of regional Arab leaders from Iran president elect would stymie its “Shia Sunni war” and “Iranophobia” projects in mmidway and blow away all the efforts of the Zionist regime for planning and launching these projects in recent years.

On the other hand, it is noteworthy that the birth, nature and survival of the Zionist regime, is in more harmony with war and instability than peace and stability. Accordingly, during the past decades, since the creation of the Zionist regime, none of the high ranking officials have been killed in war but a short term peace talks intensified domestic disagreements to the extent that it led to assassination of the then prime minister Yitzhak Rabin.

Consequently, regarding the concerns of the Zionist regime authorities over new Iranian president elect, this regime will double its efforts to undermine the relations between Iran with Arab and western governments; hence, the issue necessitates more vigilance of both sides.

HK