Titled "Suppressing Palestinian Rights Advocacy through the IHRA Working Definition of Anti-Semitism", the report by the independent Dutch-based organization uncovered shocking examples of the IHRA's weaponization against critics of Israel and the suppression of free speech under the guise of combatting anti-Semitism.
Labour's investigation was dropped in February but Neslen's lawyers, Bindmans, are seeking answers about why she was investigated in the first place. They have written to the party demanding that it carry out an independent investigation into what it alleges was a campaign of discrimination against Neslen. They insist that her anti-Zionism is a protected ...
As a lifelong campaigner for Palestinian rights and other anti-racist causes we consider the case against him to be perverse and another example of the weaponization of anti-Semitism to silence critics of Israel, the IHRC noted in a statement.